<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to your Desks, Peasants!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/</link>
	<description>Web development and Internet business technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:56:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: annabelt</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>annabelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the informed comment. That really does cast these policies in a different light, although I still think employees should have a choice in it, and even a chance to share in it, on behalf of their families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the informed comment. That really does cast these policies in a different light, although I still think employees should have a choice in it, and even a chance to share in it, on behalf of their families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Kramer</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-13</guid>
		<description>This insurance has everyone worked up for the simple reason that most people don&#039;t know how it worked.  

For the most part, it wasn&#039;t insurance at all.  Think about it: what insurance company is going to sell Wal-Mart 350,000 policies in a way that would let Wal-Mart profit from deaths?  The plans were set up so that there would be no gain or loss from the risk element of the policies.  

The gain came from tax rules that allowed companies in effect to deduct interest payments and then get that interest back tax-free.  That game worked best as the cash value of each policy increased, that is, only while the employees lived.  Each death was one less tree in the tax-avoidance orchard.  Mr. Moore doubtless found that particular truth inconvenient.

As for the label &quot;dead peasants insurance,&quot; no one ever called it that until the media lifted the term &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/yld2sfc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;out of context&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This insurance has everyone worked up for the simple reason that most people don&#8217;t know how it worked.  </p>
<p>For the most part, it wasn&#8217;t insurance at all.  Think about it: what insurance company is going to sell Wal-Mart 350,000 policies in a way that would let Wal-Mart profit from deaths?  The plans were set up so that there would be no gain or loss from the risk element of the policies.  </p>
<p>The gain came from tax rules that allowed companies in effect to deduct interest payments and then get that interest back tax-free.  That game worked best as the cash value of each policy increased, that is, only while the employees lived.  Each death was one less tree in the tax-avoidance orchard.  Mr. Moore doubtless found that particular truth inconvenient.</p>
<p>As for the label &#8220;dead peasants insurance,&#8221; no one ever called it that until the media lifted the term <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yld2sfc" rel="nofollow">out of context</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annabelt</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>annabelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I agree with the first part of your comment, up to a point.  But I think morality is more important than just a &#039;card to play&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the first part of your comment, up to a point.  But I think morality is more important than just a &#8216;card to play&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Hanley</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Hanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Taking out a life insurance on key employees is a prudent business practice. Playing the morality card is nonsensical...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking out a life insurance on key employees is a prudent business practice. Playing the morality card is nonsensical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly W. Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly W. Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-5</guid>
		<description>In both those cases they would be responsible for the resulting deaths. In fact, with that stipulation, it could actually function as an incentive to ensure workplace safety. If someone dies because you didn&#039;t properly maintain the machinery at your factory, you get nothing.
.-= Kelly W. Patterson´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://eyeam4anarchy.blogspot.com/2009/07/ticketed-for-parking-in-their-own.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ticketed for Parking in their Own Driveways in Toledo&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In both those cases they would be responsible for the resulting deaths. In fact, with that stipulation, it could actually function as an incentive to ensure workplace safety. If someone dies because you didn&#8217;t properly maintain the machinery at your factory, you get nothing.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Kelly W. Patterson´s last blog ..<a href="http://eyeam4anarchy.blogspot.com/2009/07/ticketed-for-parking-in-their-own.html" rel="nofollow">Ticketed for Parking in their Own Driveways in Toledo</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annabelt</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>annabelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Ok, so let&#039;s say a political organization takes out a massive life insurance policy on an opposing political figure, while distributing angry propaganda on its news channel - where is the moral line exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so let&#8217;s say a political organization takes out a massive life insurance policy on an opposing political figure, while distributing angry propaganda on its news channel &#8211; where is the moral line exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trubliphone</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>trubliphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Yikes - that&#039;s just creepy.  Call me idealistic,  but I don&#039;t agree that it&#039;s okay for people to profit from the suffering of others.  Nobody&#039;s talking about actively killing people.  Rather the issue is that with this type of insurance an employer may stand to gain more by _not_ looking after the welfare of its employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes &#8211; that&#8217;s just creepy.  Call me idealistic,  but I don&#8217;t agree that it&#8217;s okay for people to profit from the suffering of others.  Nobody&#8217;s talking about actively killing people.  Rather the issue is that with this type of insurance an employer may stand to gain more by _not_ looking after the welfare of its employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly W. Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/2009/e-business/employees/back-to-your-desks-peasants/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly W. Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/?p=61#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually kinda OK with being able to take out insurance on anyone even random people, so long as you aren&#039;t allowed to kill them in order to collect.
.-= Kelly W. Patterson´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://eyeam4anarchy.blogspot.com/2009/07/whether-something-was-authorized-by.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Authorized by the President&quot; isn&#039;t the Definition of Legal&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually kinda OK with being able to take out insurance on anyone even random people, so long as you aren&#8217;t allowed to kill them in order to collect.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Kelly W. Patterson´s last blog ..<a href="http://eyeam4anarchy.blogspot.com/2009/07/whether-something-was-authorized-by.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Authorized by the President&#8221; isn&#8217;t the Definition of Legal</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.ebusiness-technology.net/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
